Beyond the Birth


What Christmas Still Invites Us to Become

As we approach Christmas, millions of people around the world will gather, some in churches, some in living rooms, some simply around a shared table. Candles will be lit. Familiar songs will be sung. For many, this season carries deep spiritual meaning. For others, it holds emotional weight: a pause, a memory, a longing for something gentler than the rest of the year.

At the heart of Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. A figure revered by Christians as the embodiment of love, humility, sacrifice, and moral courage. Whatever one’s beliefs, it’s difficult to deny the influence of his life and message. Few individuals in history have shaped human values, ethics, and imagination as profoundly.

Christmas matters. Not just religiously…but humanly.

How Christmas Found Its Date

It’s also true that the Christmas we celebrate today took shape within a specific historical context. When Christianity emerged from persecution and became woven into the Roman Empire, it didn’t develop in isolation. December 25th already carried symbolic meaning in the ancient world, closely associated with the return of light after the winter solstice. The darkest days were behind us. The sun was coming back.

Rather than erasing those earlier meanings, early Christianity translated them. Light became a metaphor not just for the sun, but for hope. Renewal became spiritual as well as seasonal. Sunday, the day of the sun, became a day of worship. This wasn’t a trick or a theft; it was a recognition that symbols endure because they speak to something timeless in us.

The calendar mattered less than the meaning.

A Story Humanity Keeps Telling

When you step back far enough, a deeper pattern emerges, one that predates Christianity and extends well beyond it.

Across cultures and centuries, humans have told remarkably similar stories:
– A figure of compassion enters a suffering world.
– Darkness gives way to light.
– Sacrifice leads to renewal.
– Love proves stronger than death.

These stories appear in different forms, with different names and imagery, but they point in the same direction. Long before Christianity, cultures spoke of figures like Attis, associated with death and rebirth; Krishna, a divine embodiment of love and moral order; Dionysus, a teacher of transformation and renewal; Mithras, a symbol of light, truth, and cosmic order; and Horus, the ancient Egyptian god whose story of death, resurrection, and divine sonship symbolized the triumph of order and light over chaos.

The details vary, as they should. Cultures are not carbon copies of one another. But the attributes recur. Again and again, humanity returns to the same intuition: that compassion redeems, that light matters, that transformation is possible.

Those figures don’t diminish Jesus. They contextualize him.

From the Man to the Meaning

Here’s the question Christmas quietly asks us each year, often beneath the noise of shopping lists and social obligations:

What if the enduring power of Christmas isn’t only about who Jesus was, but about what he embodied?

Jesus didn’t invent compassion. He lived it. He modelled a way of being that refused hierarchy, rejected exclusion, and placed love at the center of human life. He didn’t ask people to admire him from a distance; he invited them to follow…to practice what he practiced.

That distinction matters.

When belief becomes more important than behaviour, the message gets lost. But when the focus shifts to embodiment, to how we treat one another, the story comes alive again.

Christ Consciousness, Simply Put

This is where the idea of Christ Consciousness (the non-denominational Christos) enters, not as doctrine, definitely not as dogma, but as orientation.

Christ Consciousness is the practice of radical empathy.
It’s seeing the other not as an opponent, but as an extension of yourself.
It’s choosing love over fear, understanding over certainty, compassion over control.

You don’t need to be Christian to recognize it.
You don’t need to abandon Christianity to live it.
You don’t need to believe anything at all, only to practice something.

In that sense, Christ Consciousness isn’t owned by a religion. It’s expressed through behaviour: forgiveness instead of retaliation, generosity instead of scarcity, presence instead of performance.

Christ Consciousness shows up in how we speak to our partners, how we listen to our children, how we disagree with those who see the world differently.

A Glimpse of the Nous Age

Some thinkers have begun to describe this widening awareness as part of what I’ve called The Nous Age, a shift toward seeing ourselves not as isolated individuals, but as one knowing people.

“Nous” speaks to shared understanding, collective intelligence, and a deeper kind of awareness. In this way of thinking, wisdom doesn’t belong to one tradition or religious tribe. It emerges wherever humans choose connection over division.

The Nous Age doesn’t ask us to discard the past. It asks us to integrate it, to recognize that the truths we’ve been circling for thousands of years may finally be asking us to live them.

How We Might Celebrate Christmas Now

So what does all of this mean for Christmas?

Perhaps it means we celebrate the birth of Jesus and the consciousness he modelled.
Perhaps it means honouring tradition without clinging to exclusivity.
Perhaps it means letting Christmas remind us, at least once a year, of who we are capable of being.

Light still returns after darkness.
Compassion still heals what fear breaks.
Love is still a practice.

If Christmas points to anything enduring, it’s this: the invitation to embody what we claim to believe.

And in a world that feels increasingly fragmented, that invitation has never been more relevant, or more needed.

Hey there, it’s been a while!


For more than a century, science has been divided between two competing stories about reality. One story, the old one, imagines the universe as a timeless machine running on eternal laws, where nothing fundamentally changes. The other story, the newer one, insists that change isn’t the exception but the rule: the cosmos evolves, life evolves, consciousness evolves, and even the questions we ask evolve with us.

Rupert Sheldrake and Nassim Haramein sit at the crossroads of these two narratives, each pushing against the idea of a frozen, mechanical universe. What makes their work powerful when combined is that they both open the door to a living, dynamic cosmos, one that doesn’t just exist, but becomes if you follow my meaning.

The laws of nature have history

Sheldrake begins by asking a simple but radical question: if the universe has a history, why wouldn’t the “laws of nature” have a history too? In a cosmos that started small and grew into galaxies, stars, planets, and life, it seems strangely inconsistent to imagine that its governing principles were fixed, eternal, and immune to change. For Sheldrake, the patterns of nature behave more like habits than commandments. They stabilize through repetition. They strengthen over time. They carry memory.

Space-Time is not empty

Haramein arrives at a similar insight from a different direction. In his view, space-time is not empty; it’s a densely structured field of information. Matter, energy, and even consciousness arise from the geometry of this field. Everything is connected because everything participates in the same underlying fabric. Where Sheldrake speaks of habits, Haramein speaks of resonance: patterns strengthening through continuous feedback between the part and the whole.

The Universe is an organism

When you put the two perspectives together, the universe looks far less like a machine and far more like an organism, one that grows, remembers, and generates novelty. Evolution isn’t limited to biology; it’s woven into the fabric of existence. And interconnectedness isn’t a poetic metaphor; it’s a structural principle. The Big Bang becomes not an explosion but a germination. Space-time ceases to be a void and becomes a creative medium! Consciousness becomes not an accident but an expression of the same evolutionary process shaping everything else.

“We are born to create.”

– David Boullata

This synthesis restores something ancient that modern science had discarded: the idea that the cosmos is both intelligible and alive. It unifies physics and metaphysics without collapsing into mysticism or dogma.

In this view, the universe is not governed by fixed laws handed down at the beginning of time, it is guided by evolving patterns that deepen over time. A universe that learns. A universe that remembers. A universe that awakens through us.

In many ways, that is the underlying spirit of The Nous Age, not a return to superstition, but a recognition that intelligence, creativity, and connectedness may be fundamental features of reality itself.


PERSONAL NOTE: I’m back and am restarting my work on the book. I hope you’ll follow along with me on this journey!

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Cosmic Perspective


I was introduced to him through the PBS program NOVA ScienceNow which he hosted from 2006-2011, but have become even more intrigued by what’s he’s had to say since then.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City. He is a plain spoken deep thinker. This video is the perfect example. I hope it opens your eyes a bit wider:

 

Later this year Neil will host a 13-part TV series to serve as a sequel and modern update to Carl Sagan’s Cosmos: A personal Journey.

You can follow Neil on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/neiltyson

INTERVIEW: Graham Hancock Speaks Out


Graham-Hancock

Graham Hancock is one of the most eminent researcher-writers on true world history. His book Fingerprints of the Gods verified my suspicion [1] that we are not the world’s first great civilization and helped propel me down a new path in my journey. He has also become an outspoken proponent of the use of Ayahuasca as a way to open the mind and expand the consciousness.

When William Henry announced that Graham would be speaking at the Revelations Symposium in Nashville, I signed up and booked my flight.

Graham Hancock, David Boullata and William Henry

Graham Hancock, David Boullata and William Henry (l-r)

We spent 3 days in the intimate beauty of the Scarritt-Bennett Center listening and learning from Graham, William and Whitley Strieber. Then as the chairs were being folded and with only minutes before leaving for the airport, he graciously agreed to sit down with me and field a few questions:

1. In regards to your first book The Sign & the Seal do you think we should insist on examination of the artifact at Axum? Would we ever be allowed?

2. In Fingerprints of the Gods you proved that we know a lot less than we think we know about the history of mankind on Earth. What for you is the critical information that needs to be taught to our kids, to the general population…and how will that change the way we see ourselves today?

3. I find Zecharia Sitchin’s research intriguing but I’m not totally convinced. How much credence do you hold to the idea that we may have been genetically modified slaves of an advanced alien species?

4. According to Israeli archeologists Amnon Ben-Tor and Sharon Zuckerman there is no physical evidence for The Exodus as told in The Bible [2] (click ‘transcript’)…suggesting that perhaps the Ark of the Covenant didn’t come from Egypt but was already in Jerusalem. Might the Ark hold a crucial piece of Zecharia Sitchin’s alien landing beacon?

Hancock-Books

5. Why did you decide that writing fiction would be an appropriate move for your writing career?

6. In Entangled, you introduce the idea of magic mushrooms, what The Clan call “Demon Penises” and the Uglies call “Little Teachers”. Is psilocybin a hallucinogen or a key to open a door to another dimension?

7. What do you think the role of psychedelics were in ancient civilizations…and how do you think they can help our modern, disjointed world?

8. What if anything do you think will come of the TEDx Talks controversy? A more open discussion on “what is science”….?

9. Are you a spiritual anarchist?

10. Who or what is God?

Graham Hancock’s new book War God will be available through Amazon UK on May 30th and later this year through Amazon Canada on August 13. You can likewise read a few sample chapters for free at the website War-God.com

 

For an updated list of Graham’s speaking engagements around the world click here.

 

Interview: Stephen S. Mehler


Stephen-S-Mehler

EARLIER THIS WEEK I had the opportunity to speak via Skype with Stephen S. Mehler, the author of The Land of Osiris and From Light into Darkness. He is one of the authors who inspired me to take my exploration of consciousness studies back in time to see if I could augment my understanding on the subject. I was looking for clues to what these ancient civilizations may have already known:

1. Who were the Khemitians?

2. What do we know about their religion…or spiritual beliefs?

3. Where the Hebrews from Khemit or from a previous civilization?

4. How are the Sufi connected to Khemit?

4a. Have the Sufi been able to stay true to their traditions or have they bent to modern Islam?

Stephan S. Mehler & Abd’El Hakim Awyan

Stephen S. Mehler & Abd’El Hakim Awyan

5. How old are the pyramids at Giza…and how can you be sure?

6. Who built the pyramids at Giza?

7. What is the Ur Nil (or Protonile) and what is it’s significance to the pyramid complex at Giza?

8. In your book “The Land of Osiris” you introduce Victor Schauberger’s theory that in the union of hydrogen and oxygen to form water a great deal of potential “energy” was stored. Could the pyramids have been used to tap into this energy?

9. In my book I hope to draw a comparison between the imagery of Horus being anointed with water by Thoth and the Baptism of Jesus (see picture below). The dove appearing over Jesus’ head is not simply “holy spirit” but a representation of a Khemitian-like advanced state of awareness/consciousness…and that the purpose of the icon is as a do-it-yourself guide. What are your thoughts on that idea?

10. Do you feel we have been mislead (on purpose or not) about the history of our planet?

My feeling is that there is a lot we can learn from looking into the past while we forge ahead with new scientific discovery. What we are learning today may have been already known, we need to find the clues that may be in plain sight.

Your comments and questions are invited below.

Horus being anointed with water by Thoth (above) - The Baptism of Jesus

Horus being anointed with water by Thoth (top) – The Baptism of Jesus

Jesus, Son of God?


dreamstime_2364068

Sometimes, it seems that the more I learn the less I know.

Growing up in a religious Orthodox Christian family, I took all of the stories around Christ’s life as fact, the unquestionable truth. But the more I dig, looking for clearer understand, I find only a shifting foundation of sand.

Take for example the Jesus, Osiris, Dionysus connection.

Jesus, Osiris, Dionysus
Dionysus, a Greek God (1500—1100 BC) and Osiris, an Egyptian God (pre-2500 BC) were viewed as ‘mythical’ characters…though there is some evidence that points to Osiris as being real and that Dionysus was only modelled after Osiris. Despite that the two characters were used interchangeably in ancient times and in the 3rd century they were even referred to by the composite name “Osiris-Dionysus“.

At the time of Jesus’ stay on the Earth some 2000 years ago the story of Dionysus and Osiris were well established but nobody seemed to notice the similarities between the 3 of them??

A Closer Look
The following stories appear both in the Gospels and in the myths of many of the god-men:

bullet Conception:

bullet God was his father. This was believed to be literally true in the case of Osiris-Dionysus; their God came to earth and engaged in sexual intercourse with a human. The father of Jesus is God in the form of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18).
bullet A human woman, a virgin, was his mother.
bullet Birth:

bullet He was born in a cave or cowshed. Luke 2:7 mentions that Jesus was placed in a manger – an eating trough for animals. One early Christian tradition said that the manger was in a cave.
bullet His birth was prophesized by a star in the heavens.
bullet Ministry:

bullet At a marriage ceremony, he performed the miracle of converting water into wine.
bullet He was powerless to perform miracles in his home town.
bullet His followers were born-again through baptism in water.
bullet He rode triumphantly into a city on a donkey. Tradition records that the inhabitants waved palm leaves.
bullet He had 12 disciples.
bullet He was accused of licentious behavior.
bullet Execution, resurrection, etc:

bullet He was killed near the time of the Vernal Equinox, about MAR-21.
bullet He died “as a sacrifice for the sins of the world.
bullet He was hung on a tree, stake, or cross. 
bullet After death, he descended into hell.
bullet On the third day after his death, he returned to life.
bullet The cave where he was laid was visited by three of his female followers
bullet He later ascended to heaven.
bullet His titles:

bullet God made flesh.
bullet Savior of the world.
bullet Son of God.
bullet Beliefs about the God-man:

bullet He is “God made man,” and equal to the Father.
bullet He will return in the last days.
bullet He will judge the human race at that time.
bullet Humans are separated from God by original sin. The god-man’s sacrificial death reunites the believer with God and atones for the original sin.
Source: Religious Tolerance.org

Nobody Noticed?
The reason that nobody noticed the similarities between Jesus and Osiris-Dionysus was because those aspects of Jesus’ life were added hundreds of years later when Rome finally accepted Christianity and fused it with her other pagan beliefs.

Jesus Was A (Great) Man
I choose to believe that Jesus was a real person, a socialist, a rebel against a corrupt Roman-Jewish alliance and perhaps someone who through study and practice of mysticism had come to a deep understanding of the world, the Universe and our place in it. And from that understanding preached love and tolerance.

If we could follow THAT example, I think the world would be a better place.

The Essence of a Cup


empty-cup

I’VE COME TO UNDERSTAND that the essence of a cup is not the cup itself, it is the space within the cup. It’s the space that defines it’s purpose…to hold something without form.

Likewise, I believe the essence of the Universe’s smallest particles is not it’s electrons, protons, neutrons, etc. Their essence, indeed their purpose has to do with the space within them.

It’s About Space
If we consider the atom is 99.99% empty space perhaps we would see that our research at CERN is looking in the wrong place to find the so-called God Particle known to scientists as the Higgs boson. And that perhaps the God Particle isn’t even a particle at all!

Ask the Right Question
As a thinking spiritualist I find it hard to watch as science continues to overlook the most obvious question…what’s with all the space? Case in point this recent article: “A question of spin for the new boson” by James Gillies.

Where is Beauty?
To quote from Alan Watts’ book Become What You Are: “A symphony is not explained by a mathematical analysis of it’s notes; the mystery of a woman’s beauty is not revealed by a postmortem dissection; and no one ever understood the wonder of a bird on the wing by stuffing it and putting it in a case.” (p.61)

The purpose of the Universe and everything in it cannot be discovered by analyzing the cup alone. The key to understanding is to ask the right questions and look in the right place for the answer.

Wake Up: Life is Only A Dream


I have always said the “Life is an Allusion”….yes, we are living in a dream of our own collective imagination…and it’s beautiful…