Consciousness Isn’t What You Think


LISTEN TO THE AUDIO VERSION

We’ve been asking the wrong question.

For decades—arguably centuries—we’ve tried to locate consciousness the same way we locate everything else: by dissecting it, measuring it, and trying to explain it.

We’ve scanned brains.
Mapped neural pathways.
Tracked electrical impulses firing in real time.

And yet… the one thing we’re trying to understand—the experience of being aware—remains just out of reach.

Because what if consciousness isn’t something we can find?

What if it’s something we’ve been standing in all along?

Look Closer

Modern thinking has trained us to believe that consciousness is a byproduct of the brain—a kind of side effect of complex computation. Neurons fire, patterns emerge, and somehow… awareness appears.

But there’s a problem with that model.

It assumes that consciousness comes after the process.

That thinking creates awareness.

But pause for a moment and look at your own experience.

Before you name something… you’re aware of it.
Before you analyze something… you’re aware of it.
Before a thought even forms… there is already awareness.

So which comes first?

If consciousness were just a product of thinking, then thinking would have to exist before awareness.

But it doesn’t.

Awareness is already there—quiet, constant, and undeniable—before the first thought arrives.

And yet, we’ve built an entire worldview that treats thinking as primary… and being as secondary.

That may be the fundamental error.

Turn It Around

There’s another way to look at this.

Instead of seeing consciousness as something the brain produces, what if we saw it as the field in which all experience happens?

Not an object.
Not a function.
Not a thing.

But the context.

Think about it this way.

Every thought you’ve ever had appears to something.
Every emotion arises within something.
Every perception—sound, sight, sensation—shows up in a kind of open space of awareness.

We don’t usually notice it because we’re so focused on the content.

The thoughts.
The noise.
The story.

But the space in which all of that happens?

That’s consciousness.

And it doesn’t come and go the way thoughts do.

It’s there when you’re focused.
It’s there when your mind is quiet.
It’s there in the middle of chaos… and in moments of stillness.

Which raises a powerful possibility:

Consciousness isn’t something you generate.

It’s something you are participating in.

Notice This

Imagine two people listening to music.

The first is analyzing it.

Breaking down the chords.
Identifying the structure.
Thinking about what comes next.

The second is simply… listening.

No commentary.
No analysis.
Just direct experience.

Same song.

Completely different relationship to it.

Now apply that to your life.

Most of us are living in the first mode—constantly interpreting, labeling, evaluating.

We’re thinking about our experience instead of actually being in it.

But every once in a while, something breaks through.

A moment of awe.
A deep conversation.
A quiet walk where everything feels… present.

In those moments, thinking fades into the background.

And what’s left isn’t emptiness.

It’s clarity.

Connection.

A sense that you’re not separate from what’s happening—you’re part of it.

That’s not the absence of consciousness.

That’s the fullness of it.

Now Try This

So here’s a simple shift to experiment with.

For the next few moments today, don’t try to understand your experience.

Don’t analyze it.

Don’t improve it.

Just notice it.

The sound around you.
The feeling in your body.
The fact that you’re aware of both.

No need to change anything.

Just recognize that awareness is already here—before the next thought, during it, and after it.

Because the goal isn’t to stop thinking.

The goal is to stop mistaking thinking for the whole story.

When you do that, something subtle but powerful happens.

You move from observing life…
to actually being in it.

And from that place, a different kind of understanding begins to emerge.

Not constructed.

Not forced.

But discovered.

Hey there, it’s been a while!


For more than a century, science has been divided between two competing stories about reality. One story, the old one, imagines the universe as a timeless machine running on eternal laws, where nothing fundamentally changes. The other story, the newer one, insists that change isn’t the exception but the rule: the cosmos evolves, life evolves, consciousness evolves, and even the questions we ask evolve with us.

Rupert Sheldrake and Nassim Haramein sit at the crossroads of these two narratives, each pushing against the idea of a frozen, mechanical universe. What makes their work powerful when combined is that they both open the door to a living, dynamic cosmos, one that doesn’t just exist, but becomes if you follow my meaning.

The laws of nature have history

Sheldrake begins by asking a simple but radical question: if the universe has a history, why wouldn’t the “laws of nature” have a history too? In a cosmos that started small and grew into galaxies, stars, planets, and life, it seems strangely inconsistent to imagine that its governing principles were fixed, eternal, and immune to change. For Sheldrake, the patterns of nature behave more like habits than commandments. They stabilize through repetition. They strengthen over time. They carry memory.

Space-Time is not empty

Haramein arrives at a similar insight from a different direction. In his view, space-time is not empty; it’s a densely structured field of information. Matter, energy, and even consciousness arise from the geometry of this field. Everything is connected because everything participates in the same underlying fabric. Where Sheldrake speaks of habits, Haramein speaks of resonance: patterns strengthening through continuous feedback between the part and the whole.

The Universe is an organism

When you put the two perspectives together, the universe looks far less like a machine and far more like an organism, one that grows, remembers, and generates novelty. Evolution isn’t limited to biology; it’s woven into the fabric of existence. And interconnectedness isn’t a poetic metaphor; it’s a structural principle. The Big Bang becomes not an explosion but a germination. Space-time ceases to be a void and becomes a creative medium! Consciousness becomes not an accident but an expression of the same evolutionary process shaping everything else.

“We are born to create.”

– David Boullata

This synthesis restores something ancient that modern science had discarded: the idea that the cosmos is both intelligible and alive. It unifies physics and metaphysics without collapsing into mysticism or dogma.

In this view, the universe is not governed by fixed laws handed down at the beginning of time, it is guided by evolving patterns that deepen over time. A universe that learns. A universe that remembers. A universe that awakens through us.

In many ways, that is the underlying spirit of The Nous Age, not a return to superstition, but a recognition that intelligence, creativity, and connectedness may be fundamental features of reality itself.


PERSONAL NOTE: I’m back and am restarting my work on the book. I hope you’ll follow along with me on this journey!

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Cosmic Perspective


I was introduced to him through the PBS program NOVA ScienceNow which he hosted from 2006-2011, but have become even more intrigued by what’s he’s had to say since then.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City. He is a plain spoken deep thinker. This video is the perfect example. I hope it opens your eyes a bit wider:

 

Later this year Neil will host a 13-part TV series to serve as a sequel and modern update to Carl Sagan’s Cosmos: A personal Journey.

You can follow Neil on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/neiltyson

Can Science and Religion Be Integrated?


Of the many great teachers that I’ve had, I believe that Amit Goswammi, Ph.D has had the greatest effect on the thinking process that brought me to The Nous Age Principle.

Here is a paper he wrote in 2008 called Can Science and Religion be Integrated? describing the Quantum Consciousness as God:

…The good news is that not one, but three separate experiments are now showing that quantum consciousness, the author of downward causation is nonlocal, is unitive, is God. The first such experiment proving it unequivocally (that is, with objective machines and not through subjective experiences of people) was performed by the neurophysiologist Jacobo Grinberg and his collaborators at the University of Mexico. Let’s go into some details…

Read More Here…