When the Gods Leave, What Takes Their Place?


Two thousand years ago, the Greek philosopher Plutarch observed that you could find cities without walls, kings, or wealth…but not cities without gods.

Two thousand years later, the gods appear to be leaving.

The question is whether our need for them went with them.

Across much of the Western world, organized religion has been losing its hold. Churches that once stood at the centre of community life struggle to fill their pews. Increasing numbers of people describe themselves as having no religion at all. Institutions that once claimed enormous authority over questions of morality, meaning, death and eternity no longer command the automatic obedience they once did.

It would be easy to conclude that humanity is simply becoming less religious.

But perhaps something more interesting is happening.

Perhaps belief doesn’t disappear.

Perhaps it changes containers.

The Space Religion Occupied

For thousands of years, religion did considerably more than tell us what happened after we died.

It placed us inside a story.

It told us where we came from. Why we were here. What was expected of us. What existed beyond the visible world. Whether there was an intelligence greater than our own. Whether someone or something was watching.

Religion provided community, ritual and moral structure. But it also provided mystery.

And human beings seem remarkably uncomfortable living without mystery.

This doesn’t mean religion was created simply to control people. History is rarely that tidy. Belief can emerge sincerely among ordinary people while institutions subsequently discover that belief has another property:

It has power.

Ancient Rome provides an extraordinary example.

When Rome Changed Its Mind

For centuries, Christians periodically faced Roman persecution. Their refusal to participate in aspects of Roman religious life could be interpreted as defiance of the social and political order.

Then something remarkable happened.

Rome stopped trying to destroy Christianity and began embracing it.

Constantine legalized Christianity in the early fourth century and increasingly patronized it. Later in that century, under Theodosius I, Nicene Christianity became bound increasingly closely to imperial authority.

But Rome did not invent Christianity. By the time Constantine embraced it, Christian communities had flourished for centuries across the Eastern Mediterranean, including ancient traditions that would eventually form the foundations of Eastern Orthodox Christianity.

Rome’s great achievement may therefore have been something subtler than creating a religion.

It recognized the power of one that was already there.

Imperial authority became involved in Christian disputes. Councils helped define orthodoxy. Certain interpretations became authoritative while others were increasingly pushed outside the boundaries of acceptable belief. Christianity itself developed within the surrounding Greek and Roman world, absorbing its language, philosophy and cultural environment.

Over time, belief and institutional power became deeply intertwined.

The lesson isn’t necessarily that powerful people invent religions to control populations.

The more interesting lesson may be that institutions can recognize an emerging belief system, organize it, legitimize particular interpretations of it and eventually become authorities over it.

Which brings us, rather unexpectedly, to the sky.

Something Is Changing Above Us

For most of the modern era, UFOs occupied the cultural territory of science fiction, tabloid newspapers and conspiracy theories.

That has changed.

With the Pentagon’s latest release of previously classified UAP material, the sixth release of its kind in roughly five months, we are being given another glimpse into just how seriously parts of the U.S. government have investigated phenomena once dismissed to the fringes. The newly released material includes records connected to a secretive military program that commissioned studies into subjects as extraordinary as wormholes, exotic propulsion and the possible biological effects of unexplained encounters.

None of this proves extraterrestrials are visiting Earth.

That distinction matters enormously.

But something culturally important can be happening regardless of whether a single extraterrestrial spacecraft has ever entered our atmosphere.

Look at the questions increasingly surrounding the phenomenon.

Are we alone?

Is there an intelligence greater than ours?

Where do we come from?

Could another intelligence have been watching us?

Is reality larger than what we can perceive?

What happens when humanity finally discovers that it isn’t at the centre of everything?

Those aren’t merely scientific questions.

They are some of the oldest questions human beings have ever asked.

We once carried many of them into temples and churches.

Increasingly, we’re carrying them elsewhere.

A New Container

This doesn’t require a secret government plan.

In fact, that’s precisely what makes the possibility more interesting.

Rome didn’t need to invent Christianity to recognize its cultural power. Christianity was already there.

Perhaps modern institutions don’t need to invent our fascination with extraterrestrial intelligence either.

It is already here.

The important question therefore may not be whether governments are preparing us to believe in extraterrestrials.

It may be what happens if millions of people begin believing anyway.

Who interprets the phenomenon?

Who determines which information is credible?

Who possesses the secret knowledge?

Who decides what gets revealed?

And perhaps most importantly: who becomes the authority standing between ordinary people and something they cannot understand for themselves?

Those questions should sound strangely familiar.

Because we’ve asked versions of them before.

Perhaps the most interesting thing about the decline of organized religion isn’t that Western societies are abandoning belief.

Perhaps we’re watching belief migrate from churches and scriptures toward consciousness, the cosmos and the possibility that we are not alone.

Plutarch couldn’t imagine congressional hearings about unidentified objects moving through the sky.

But I suspect he would recognize the people watching them.

Because two thousand years later, humanity may still be doing what it has always done:

Looking upward.

Searching for something greater than ourselves.

Trying to understand our place in an enormous and mysterious universe.

Perhaps belief doesn’t disappear.

Perhaps it simply changes containers.

Consciousness Isn’t What You Think


LISTEN TO THE AUDIO VERSION

We’ve been asking the wrong question.

For decades—arguably centuries—we’ve tried to locate consciousness the same way we locate everything else: by dissecting it, measuring it, and trying to explain it.

We’ve scanned brains.
Mapped neural pathways.
Tracked electrical impulses firing in real time.

And yet… the one thing we’re trying to understand—the experience of being aware—remains just out of reach.

Because what if consciousness isn’t something we can find?

What if it’s something we’ve been standing in all along?

Look Closer

Modern thinking has trained us to believe that consciousness is a byproduct of the brain—a kind of side effect of complex computation. Neurons fire, patterns emerge, and somehow… awareness appears.

But there’s a problem with that model.

It assumes that consciousness comes after the process.

That thinking creates awareness.

But pause for a moment and look at your own experience.

Before you name something… you’re aware of it.
Before you analyze something… you’re aware of it.
Before a thought even forms… there is already awareness.

So which comes first?

If consciousness were just a product of thinking, then thinking would have to exist before awareness.

But it doesn’t.

Awareness is already there—quiet, constant, and undeniable—before the first thought arrives.

And yet, we’ve built an entire worldview that treats thinking as primary… and being as secondary.

That may be the fundamental error.

Turn It Around

There’s another way to look at this.

Instead of seeing consciousness as something the brain produces, what if we saw it as the field in which all experience happens?

Not an object.
Not a function.
Not a thing.

But the context.

Think about it this way.

Every thought you’ve ever had appears to something.
Every emotion arises within something.
Every perception—sound, sight, sensation—shows up in a kind of open space of awareness.

We don’t usually notice it because we’re so focused on the content.

The thoughts.
The noise.
The story.

But the space in which all of that happens?

That’s consciousness.

And it doesn’t come and go the way thoughts do.

It’s there when you’re focused.
It’s there when your mind is quiet.
It’s there in the middle of chaos… and in moments of stillness.

Which raises a powerful possibility:

Consciousness isn’t something you generate.

It’s something you are participating in.

Notice This

Imagine two people listening to music.

The first is analyzing it.

Breaking down the chords.
Identifying the structure.
Thinking about what comes next.

The second is simply… listening.

No commentary.
No analysis.
Just direct experience.

Same song.

Completely different relationship to it.

Now apply that to your life.

Most of us are living in the first mode—constantly interpreting, labeling, evaluating.

We’re thinking about our experience instead of actually being in it.

But every once in a while, something breaks through.

A moment of awe.
A deep conversation.
A quiet walk where everything feels… present.

In those moments, thinking fades into the background.

And what’s left isn’t emptiness.

It’s clarity.

Connection.

A sense that you’re not separate from what’s happening—you’re part of it.

That’s not the absence of consciousness.

That’s the fullness of it.

Now Try This

So here’s a simple shift to experiment with.

For the next few moments today, don’t try to understand your experience.

Don’t analyze it.

Don’t improve it.

Just notice it.

The sound around you.
The feeling in your body.
The fact that you’re aware of both.

No need to change anything.

Just recognize that awareness is already here—before the next thought, during it, and after it.

Because the goal isn’t to stop thinking.

The goal is to stop mistaking thinking for the whole story.

When you do that, something subtle but powerful happens.

You move from observing life…
to actually being in it.

And from that place, a different kind of understanding begins to emerge.

Not constructed.

Not forced.

But discovered.

When the Faders Come Up


Years ago, I was talking with a sound engineer I knew about the art of mixing music.

He told me a story that has stayed with me ever since, and it is beginning to make sense in today’s geopolitical climate.

He was asked to mix a multitrack recording of a blues band. He instantly regretted saying yes when he began soloing the individual tracks.

The vocal sounded rough, almost painful.
The bass felt sloppy and uncertain.
The drums weren’t particularly tight.

If you heard any one of them alone, you might have thought, This isn’t going to work.

Then he brought all the faders up together.

What came out of the speakers was glorious.

It was emotional.
It was cohesive.
It was alive.

The band didn’t sound broken.
It sounded human.

And somehow, in the blend, all the rough edges found their place.

That was his lesson.

Stop obsessing over every isolated imperfection.
Start listening to the whole.

Where We Are

We live in a world that’s forgotten how to do that.

We are constantly soloing tracks.

We solo countries.
We solo cultures.
We solo identities.
We solo headlines.

And when we do, we hear flaws.

We hear distortion.
We hear imbalance.
We hear things that feel unfinished.

But nothing in the world was ever meant to be heard in isolation.

No single instrument carries the song.
No single nation carries humanity.

The music only emerges when the faders come up together.

The Deeper Truth

There is a deeper truth here.

When you solo a track long enough, you stop hearing music.
You start hearing imperfections.

That’s where we are culturally.

We magnify differences.
We amplify mistakes.
We critique endlessly.

It’s as if we believe that if we just tune every instrument perfectly in isolation, harmony will automatically appear.

But that isn’t how music works.

And it isn’t how civilization works either.

Perfection Is the Enemy

In mixing, perfection is often the enemy of life.

Over-tune the vocal and you lose its soul.
Over-quantize the drums and you lose the groove.
Over-compress the track and you lose the breath.

Sometimes what sounds flawed alone is what makes the whole feel real.

The slight rasp in the voice becomes emotion.
The looseness in the rhythm becomes feel.
The friction becomes energy.

Difference, in context, becomes beauty.

What We Need

The Nous Age, will not be an age of uniformity.

It will be an age of conscious blending.

An age where we understand that humanity is not a solo performance.
It is an ensemble.

No culture needs to disappear for the music to work.
No nation needs to be erased for harmony to exist.
No identity needs to be tuned into sameness.

What we need is balance.

We need listening.

We need perspective.

We need to hear the whole before we judge the parts.

It’s In the Mix

Think about it.

A single neuron doesn’t think.
A single note doesn’t move us.
A single voice doesn’t create a civilization.

But networks do.
Ensembles do.
Interconnection does.

The miracle is not in the track.

It’s in the mix.

Shift the Focus

Maybe the work of this century is not to fix every isolated imperfection.

Maybe it is to raise the faders together.

To widen the frame.
To shift from critique to context.
To hear humanity not as fragments, but as an emerging composition.

Because when you listen to the whole, something changes.

You begin to hear coherence where before you heard chaos.
You begin to feel belonging where before you felt division.
You begin to sense that the music was always there.

We just weren’t listening properly.

Is Anything “Wrong”

The Nous Age begins the moment we stop asking,
“What’s wrong with this track?”

And start asking,

“What happens when we let the ensemble play?”

And then — bravely —
we bring the faders up.

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Cosmic Perspective


I was introduced to him through the PBS program NOVA ScienceNow which he hosted from 2006-2011, but have become even more intrigued by what’s he’s had to say since then.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City. He is a plain spoken deep thinker. This video is the perfect example. I hope it opens your eyes a bit wider:

 

Later this year Neil will host a 13-part TV series to serve as a sequel and modern update to Carl Sagan’s Cosmos: A personal Journey.

You can follow Neil on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/neiltyson

INTERVIEW: Graham Hancock Speaks Out


Graham-Hancock

Graham Hancock is one of the most eminent researcher-writers on true world history. His book Fingerprints of the Gods verified my suspicion [1] that we are not the world’s first great civilization and helped propel me down a new path in my journey. He has also become an outspoken proponent of the use of Ayahuasca as a way to open the mind and expand the consciousness.

When William Henry announced that Graham would be speaking at the Revelations Symposium in Nashville, I signed up and booked my flight.

Graham Hancock, David Boullata and William Henry

Graham Hancock, David Boullata and William Henry (l-r)

We spent 3 days in the intimate beauty of the Scarritt-Bennett Center listening and learning from Graham, William and Whitley Strieber. Then as the chairs were being folded and with only minutes before leaving for the airport, he graciously agreed to sit down with me and field a few questions:

1. In regards to your first book The Sign & the Seal do you think we should insist on examination of the artifact at Axum? Would we ever be allowed?

2. In Fingerprints of the Gods you proved that we know a lot less than we think we know about the history of mankind on Earth. What for you is the critical information that needs to be taught to our kids, to the general population…and how will that change the way we see ourselves today?

3. I find Zecharia Sitchin’s research intriguing but I’m not totally convinced. How much credence do you hold to the idea that we may have been genetically modified slaves of an advanced alien species?

4. According to Israeli archeologists Amnon Ben-Tor and Sharon Zuckerman there is no physical evidence for The Exodus as told in The Bible [2] (click ‘transcript’)…suggesting that perhaps the Ark of the Covenant didn’t come from Egypt but was already in Jerusalem. Might the Ark hold a crucial piece of Zecharia Sitchin’s alien landing beacon?

Hancock-Books

5. Why did you decide that writing fiction would be an appropriate move for your writing career?

6. In Entangled, you introduce the idea of magic mushrooms, what The Clan call “Demon Penises” and the Uglies call “Little Teachers”. Is psilocybin a hallucinogen or a key to open a door to another dimension?

7. What do you think the role of psychedelics were in ancient civilizations…and how do you think they can help our modern, disjointed world?

8. What if anything do you think will come of the TEDx Talks controversy? A more open discussion on “what is science”….?

9. Are you a spiritual anarchist?

10. Who or what is God?

Graham Hancock’s new book War God will be available through Amazon UK on May 30th and later this year through Amazon Canada on August 13. You can likewise read a few sample chapters for free at the website War-God.com

 

For an updated list of Graham’s speaking engagements around the world click here.

 

Alan Watts, Love Everything


I just discovered this amazing little video and wanted to share it here as a thought provoker as more and more people are drawn toward The Nous Age and what it is. I have never felt the peace I feel while looking up, out into the Universe with my Meade telescope. It’s the greatest show on Earth!